Skip to content
Market Update

NOM Squeezed 82%. DOOD Is Running the Same Setup.

Zirodelta Research
Quantitative Research5 min read

NOMUSDT printed negative funding for 36 straight hours. Then it squeezed 82%.

That move resolved on March 30. Today, DOODUSDT is running an almost identical setup — persistently negative funding across every exchange we track, price barely off the lows. The crowd is positioned short. The question is whether DOOD follows NOM's script.

The NOM Setup: What the Data Shows

From March 28 at 23:00 UTC through March 30 at 01:00 UTC, NOM funding on Bybit averaged below -0.5% per period. At the worst hours, it hit -1.36% per period — that's annualized short-side carry above 1,000%.

Shorts were collecting that carry every hour. The crowd held.

Hour (UTC)Bybit FundingNOM Price
Mar 28 23:00-1.26%$0.00267
Mar 29 00:00-1.36%$0.00263
Mar 29 10:00-0.82%$0.00283
Mar 29 15:00-0.89%$0.00250
Mar 30 00:00-1.33%$0.00257
Mar 30 01:00-0.50%$0.00327
Mar 30 02:00-0.07%$0.00396
Mar 30 06:00+0.005%$0.00344

Price moved from $0.00230 to $0.00419 — 82% — in under 6 hours. By the time funding flipped positive, the squeeze was over.

Across all four reporting exchanges, the move confirmed:

ExchangeLowHighMoveAvg Funding (48h)
Binance$0.002300$0.004188+82.1%-0.287%
Bybit$0.002298$0.004182+81.9%-0.216%
Gate$0.002310$0.004161+80.1%-0.513%
KuCoin$0.002303$0.004203+82.5%-0.305%

Gate's 48-hour average of -0.513% per interval was the most extreme. Shorts on Gate were collecting meaningful carry while the setup built. When the squeeze hit, it hit simultaneously on all venues.

DOOD Right Now: Same Pattern

DOODUSDT funding has been negative across all five exchanges since March 30 at 01:00 UTC — over 30 hours ago.

Peak intensity was at 06:00–07:00 UTC on March 30, when Bybit hit -2.71% per period and KuCoin hit -1.98%. Those rates have since moderated, but as of 06:00 UTC today, all five venues are still running negative:

ExchangeCurrent Funding (per period)APR Equivalent
Bybit-0.35%-383%
Gate-0.32%-352%
KuCoin-0.17%-370%
Binance-0.16%-350%
Hyperliquid-0.088%-192%

DOOD price: $0.0031. It has barely moved. The short crowd is still in.

This is not identical to NOM — DOOD's funding peaked at higher absolute values and has been moderating for 12+ hours, which may indicate shorts are beginning to cover. But the pattern is recognizable: sustained multi-exchange negative funding with no corresponding price flush downward. Either shorts are right and the underlying bid collapses, or they aren't and a squeeze follows.

Today's Top Movers by Rate Magnitude

Separate from the DOOD setup, the 24-hour settlement window ending March 31 at 06:00 UTC produced these extremes:

ExchangeSymbolRate (per period)APRInterval
KuCoinDOODUSDT-1.8016%-39.5%4h
KuCoinDUSDT-1.2127%-26.6%4h
BinanceDUSDT-0.6955%-15.2%4h
KuCoinMOODENGUSDT-0.3962%-8.7%4h
KuCoinOGNUSDT-0.324%-7.1%4h
KuCoinPHBUSDT+0.3022%+3.3%8h
KuCoinRIVERUSDT+0.1846%+16.2%1h

DUSDT (the D token) printing extreme negative on both KuCoin and Binance simultaneously mirrors the cross-exchange BTRUSDT event from earlier this week. When the same directional extreme shows up across venues in the same window, it typically signals position-level pressure rather than venue-specific mechanics.

RIVERUSDT at +0.1846% on KuCoin (1h interval) is the positive outlier worth noting — at 16.2% annualized, shorts are being crowded out on the hourly schedule.

Crowd Bias: Where the Extremes Are

Among assets with available long/short account data, two stand out for divergent setups:

ExchangeSymbolLong Account %Funding (per 8h)APR
BybitAPTUSDT75.9%-0.0455%-49.8%
Bybit1000PEPEUSDT78.4%+0.0067%+7.4%
BybitMNTUSDT78.1%-0.0041%-4.5%
BybitTONUSDT79.6%+0.0011%+1.2%

APT is the sharpest case: 76% of accounts are long, yet funding is negative at -49.8% APR. That means the short side, though a minority of accounts, holds enough size to pull the funding rate negative — paying longs to stay in. A crowded long with negative funding is an unusual configuration. If the short conviction breaks, longs collect the squeeze.

1000PEPE is the opposite: 78.4% long, funding positive at +7.4% APR. The long crowd is paying shorts to sit there. That carry works against longs the longer it runs.

What Follows Sustained Negative Funding

The NOM case is one data point. It fits the broader pattern in our dataset: when funding runs deeply negative across multiple exchanges for more than 24 hours without a corresponding flush lower, the statistical reversion tends to be faster and larger than when funding drifts negative slowly.

The mechanism is straightforward. Shorts accumulate carry income and position confidence while price holds. When the underlying bid asserts itself — even modestly — the carry income disappears and the crowd has to unwind in the same direction simultaneously.

DOOD's funding began moderating today, which either means the short unwind is already underway (in size, just not in price yet) or the short crowd is simply reducing exposure after an unusually expensive 30-hour hold.

Either outcome resolves in the next 24–48 hours.


Track DOOD funding across all five exchanges in real time on Settled's rates feed. Current prediction markets for upcoming DOOD funding periods are live at /predict/.


Data sourced from Zirodelta's ClickHouse data warehouse. Snapshots at 10-minute intervals across Binance, Bybit, Gate, KuCoin, and Hyperliquid. All funding rates expressed per settlement period; APR annualized from per-period rate × annual periods.

Zirodelta Research

The research arm of Zirodelta. Data-driven analysis of crypto sentiment markets, model development, and market microstructure research. Data-driven. Real-time. Across 6 exchanges and 3,700+ perpetual futures.

Learn more about Zirodelta
HomeMarketsRatesBoardPortfolio